I plan to release the current state of HEAD as version 1.5.1 ASAP. The idea behind that is to get more testing for all of our new features, in particular for Dmitry's new libm.a code. Since releases are also provided as binary releases (which are independent of the underlying operating system), that would give interested users the option to `upgrade' their library without having to compile it themselves.
Are there any objections to this? Note that I'm planning on fixing some of the reported bugs anyway afterwards, with the goal to have that included in an upcoming stable release 1.4.7. There are upcoming releases for both, FreeBSD (version 6.3 and 7.0 are getting out there now) as well as WinAVR that we'd like to ship with a new library version. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
