As Dmitry Xmelkov wrote:

> Follow-up Comment #2:
> 
> I can not to reproduce this bug with Avr-libc 1.6
> 
> With Avr-libc 1.4 (old variant of vfprintf()), yes, it is a bug:
> documention does not say about any limits of string
> length in case of 'width' field absence.

Thanks for your analysis.  I've added a mandatory "Release" field to
the bug tracker form so new submissions can indicate which avr-libc
release they are being reported for.

> I have write the test case and will commit to CVS later.

It's been exactly my hope that you would also write a test case. ;-)
You're much better on that than me.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to