On Tuesday 29 April 2008 09:06, Weddington, Eric wrote: > > As Weddington, Eric wrote: > > > Are there any potential issues with this patch?
Seems, this patch is poor in case of _SFR_ASM_COMPAT. The _SFR_ADDR() uses the hard constant (0x20), the user can set __SFR_OFFSET to 0x20 value... All is too cryptic... I will mail a suggestion to simplify _SFR's macroses. Dmitry. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
