Follow-up Comment #5, bug #24890 (project avr-libc):
Thanks, Ruud!
You are right. The simplificion of initial comparison and
the reorganization of loop save a few words and cycles.
And after division the smallest value is really 0x0E.
(I have add the test program of this fact into source as
comment.) After testing I shall commit yours variant with
changes:
1. Macro 'FUNCTION' and 'clt' statement are restored.
Without first a relocation error is possible. The second is
needed for negative args.
2. I have add extra entry '__fp_mpack_finite' and jump to it
to save few cycles.
Testing in progress...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24890>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
