On Wednesday 24 December 2008 13:59, Weddington, Eric wrote: > > I prefer variant avr-libc 2.0 / GCC 4.4. But I assume that > > Dmitry would object, he prefers not to restrict the GCC > > version for using with avr-libc.
Yes, thanks :-) > > In this case, I agree with > > the option to add the "lib per device" patch in avr-libc 1.8. > > Dmitry, could you comment on this? > > We have needed to do lib-per-device in avr-libc for a long time. I remember > discussing this with Joerg and Ted Roth probably back in 2003 even. I don't > see how we can implement this feature without limiting it to specific > versions. I have not stood the Anatoliy's patch in details as yet. I shall to do it. In general, there is a question: is it possible to avoid any changes in GCC? After all, it has the full set of command line switches to point libraries? And... Is it a good design of Avr-gcc, when any addition new MCU leads to recompile GCC toolchain (or to install the new WinAVR) instead to download io header and to add a line into a small configuration file? Regards, Dmitry. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
