As Ruud Vlaming wrote: > > > New patch attached. > > > begin 666 bootstrap.patch > >> m26y...@z(&)O;W1S=')A< H]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T] > >> M/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]"E)#4R!F > >> M:6QE.B O<V]U<F-E<R]A=G(M;&EB8R]A=G(M;&EB8R]B;V]T<W1R87 l...@ir > > > Without testing, looks fine to me.
> Wow Joerg, i knew you'r good, but do you have uudecode in your optic > nerve? Nope. :-) But it's only been the list server that removed his plaintext patch (because it was declared application/octet-stream), while I got the original patch because Eric Cc'ed me in his mail. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
