As Weddington, Eric wrote: > Some concerns: > > Simulate: regression/bug-22828.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 24 > Simulate: regression/bug-22828.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 24
Strange enough, for me this only fails for the AT90S8515 simulation, but works for the ATmega128 simulation. This is independent of the compiler used (GCC 4.2.2 or 4.3.1). The test case performs an EEPROM block read, so it might be related to the other EEPROM failures. > Simulate: math/isinf-01.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > Simulate: math/isinf-01.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > > Simulate: math/modf-np.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 18 > Simulate: math/modf-np.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 18 > > Simulate: math/signbit-01.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 2 > Simulate: math/signbit-01.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 2 I see these as well when compiling with GCC 4.3.x, while with GCC 4.2.1, only signbit-01.c fails. Maybe Dmitry can shed some light onto that? > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega128 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s2313 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s4414 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega8 ... *** simulate failed: 22 > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega16 ... *** simulate failed: 22 That could perhaps be an issue with the simulator itself. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
