> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API > > As Weddington, Eric wrote: > > > > I wonder whether there's a point in using a struct rather than a > > > three-byte array? > > > In theory, it doesn't really matter. It seems the OP (on the Freaks > > thread) did a little copy and past from the fuses header file. Is > > there a reason you have for the preference? > > Bloat. One more struct tag etc. -- and I don't see any gain of it, > compared to the array. Array initialization is a well-defined thing > since the old K&R days, so there's no ambiguity involved.
Point. I'll work up an alternative, and add docs. Since we're in the middle of a release, I'll hold off on this until 1.6.6. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
