As Harald Kipp wrote:
> According to the document above, this may not work as expected. It
> should have been
>
> # define sei() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sei" :: "memory")
I think we've been at that discussion before, and eventually agreed
there's no point why sei() should imply a memory barrier. I forgot
about the details though, it's been a number of years ago.
Anyway, it might make sense to provide an additional macro like
__memory_barrier() that expands to __asm__ __volatile__(""::"memory").
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
