Follow-up Comment #2, patch #6805 (project avr-libc): Good idea - a more complete implementation that mine (which was based on Marek's original). I assume it will use the number for the vector and not the "handler_name" (the C++ requirement).
Just curious - what is an example of (2)? Ron _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6805> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.nongnu.org/ _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev