Follow-up Comment #2, patch #6805 (project avr-libc):

Good idea - a more complete implementation that mine (which was based on
Marek's original). I assume it will use the number for the vector and not the
"handler_name" (the C++ requirement).

Just curious - what is an example of (2)?

Ron


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6805>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to