> -----Original Message----- > From: > avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of rr > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:06 AM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Problems building binutils 2.19 > > Question: Which patches should we use?
In general, Joerg and I try to have an equivalent set of patches, though at times one or the other of us is off by a release. If one of us is off, then just let us know and we'll get the situation resolved. > > The patches found in > "http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/avr-binutil > s/files/" > have any special order to patch? > I am going to install binutils 2.19. Should I use 2.19.1 patches too? > If I'd install binutils 2.19.1, should I use 2.19 patches too? IIRC, 2.19.1 has one of the AVR specfici 2.19 patches committed. So if you use 2.19 + patches, then this should be equivalent to 2.19.1. There were not very many changes between 2.19 and 2.19.1 and IIRC, they were mostly port specific. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
