On Saturday 19 September 2009 17:41, Weddington, Eric wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > As for the style (camel vs. underscore), I'm not sure we > > really came to a conclusion on that. Ok, kicking in from the side line ... I am very pleased with the initiative. > Personally I find the camel style hard to read. Having spaces > (underscores) help to separate words, Exactly the reason why i don't use them. I like a compact code style so the few spaces present should stand out as spaces. I often confuse the underscore with spaces. Its camelCase for me, that is, in my own programs. But i would certainly say, make the new lib in the style of what is already there. Don't mix styles.
> Camel style is also very Microsoft-ish, whereas lowercase style > with underscores is very typical of the C language and C run > time library. The latter maybe be true, the former is no argument at all, and even if so, whats wrong with Microsoft apart from a few of their operating systems and most of their programms? I did not know they invented camel, (lets look, i think i have some old basic programs on the PET in camel), and even if they did, lets pick the cherries. (But probably they copied it from someone too ... ;-) Well anyway, nice that this is all hapening!! Ruud _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
