I made a mistake. I wrote AT90USB168 instead of AT90USB162.

Sorry for my distraction..

Paul Rathgeb


On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 19:00 +0100, Paul Rathgeb wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm starting a new project based on an ATMEGA16U2. 
> Unfortunately, I don't found informations about the avr-libc support for
> this controller. ATMEGA16U4 seems supported, but I don't know if I can
> use this MCU type for the compilation.
> 
> In the Atmel USB PID list, I saw that the bootloader PID for ATMEGA16U2
> is the same than AT90USB168. My supplier told me something about the
> AT90USB168 and the ATMEGA16U2, but I don't remember what... I'm
> wondering if he was not saying that ATMEGA16U2 is the replacement part
> of the deprecated (or being deprecated) AT90USB168.
> 
> If someone could help me to find which device I have to configure in
> order to have a good support for this MCU, it would really be great.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Paul Rathgeb
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev




_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to