As Dmitry K. wrote: > But, what is a reason for migration?
Well, I've started to use SVN in a number of projects in the past years, and found it mostly better than CVS as a general opinion. That starts with simple things in day-to-day operation, like "svn status" giving you a simple one-line status about each file where with CVS, you'd have to abuse a "cvs update" command in order to get a short summary of your changed files. One of the really big improvements in SVN though is the ability to move a file, and this also caused my recent request (I'd like to move util/delay.h to util/delay.h.in, so it can be modified by the configure script). As I remembered the request to switch to SVN already came up in the past from other developers, and Eric's only argument against it was lack of time at those people who might be willing (and able) to do it, I just picked it up now. While the migration has already been done on savannah, there's still some permission issue with the SVN tree. I haven't been able to commit anything by now. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
