As Weddington, Eric wrote: > Hmm. Anatoly had previously mentioned to me that builtins.h > shouldn't actually go into avr-libc. But I can't seem to find the > emails right now where we discussed this.
I figured we did already distribute it "to the masses" as part of WinAVR, so instead of applying a distribution-local patch for a software package that is completely within our domain, I'd like to have it directly in avr-libc. Of course, only those functions that are actually working should be mentioned, everything else can go away. But I think we're at least a month or two away from another avr-libc release, so there's time enough to test it, and commit changes right now. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
