The reason why I wanted them unified was so that I could write one piece of UART code that would work with all avr micro-controllers. If both were listed then that would be possible. Otherwise my code has to make the definitions. I think listing both would be good. (Ideally Atmel would unify their names.)
On 05/13/2010 11:57 AM, Jan Waclawek wrote: > Still, what would hurt to list both? > > Jan Waclawek > > ----- Original Message --------------- > >> Good policy. Thanks. >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have noticed that iom16.h, iom323.h, iom32.h, and iom8.h all define >>> USART_RXC_vect and USART_TXC_vect >>> while the headers for other micro-controllers define >>> USART_RX_vect and USART_TX_vect instead. >>> >>> I think that these definitions should be unified. Am I right? >>> > > > >>> Our policy is to match whatever the datasheet uses. As the datasheet >>> of the ATmega16 & Co. used USART,TXC, we have it that way, too. >>> >>> I don't think anyone is going to modify these very old datasheets >>> anymore. >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
