As Bradley Jarvis wrote: > The wrapper functions appear to work quite well and the class objects > created with new do behave like one created using gcc for the x86 arch > including running the constructor and destructor.
I've got only two concerns about that: . This your email will get lost in outer space soon; don't miss to file a patch request as soon as the discussion here settled. Please don't forget to patch the documentation (I think, at least the FAQ contains some remarks about the state of C++, so that should be updated). . Where should those workarounds go to? I'm not a C++ expert, but I think as new and delete are operators in C++, no particular header file is needed for them. So, we could either add them to <stdlib.h> (which declares malloc() and friends for the C language), wrapped in #if defined __cplusplus brackets, or add a separate header file, like <compat/c++.h>, or something like that. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
