On Monday 21 March 2011, you wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org > > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org] On > > Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:37 AM > > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > > Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1? > > > > On Atmels website: > > > > http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/as5-beta/avr8-gnu-toolchain- > > 3.2.0.255-source.zip > > > > there are patches for libc 1.7.1 > > > <snip> > > > > But version 1.7.1 is very new and does it need patching? > > > > Furthermore, the first two patches (40, 41) can be applied, > > but compilation results in an error: > <snip> > > > > I am curious at your opinion. > > Hi Ruud, > > First off, does binutils and gcc patch cleanly and build correctly?
Yes, with versions: binutils: 20.1 gcc: 4.4.3 mpfr: 3.0.0 gmp: 5.0.1 All patches accepted with (small) offsets for most hunks. I solved the 52-avr-libc-1.7.1-atmega32_5_50_90_pa.patch problem, this was due to a patch mismatch in binuitls om my behalf. (Good tip Eric! It forced me to really check this) However, the problems with 40-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega32X1.patch 41-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega128b1.patch remain. It could be related to http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=731525 but i do not have the 'unknown MCU' in my output, so it is probably something else. Ruud _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
