Hi Erik XMega device support is coming out of Atmel. I'm reviewing a second draft of patches for binutils at the moment. Joerg and Georg-Johann have been reviewing this patches as well.
Regarding device support, I would hold off doing any work until I can confirm that everything is in order for gcc and avr-libc. The main thing I was interested in was if anyone would be interested in helping a bit on the bug list. Thanks, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org] On > Behalf Of Erik Walthinsen > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:05 PM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? > > On 11/16/2012 11:05 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote: > > Any help from those of you who are *not* regular contributors would be > very much appreciated. Ways that you can help: If you think you know how to > fix a particular bug (and header file bugs are generally the easiest to > fix), then you can help by working up a patch that we can immediately > apply. It helps to provide a full patch, with changes to the NEWS file and > a Changelog entry, according to policy. > > If SVN trunk is considered accurate, then a large amount of Xmega device > support is missing (e.g. every -U device for instance). The fact that > it's also missing from binutils and gcc doesn't help, but I'll see if I > can put together a patch for avr-libc SVN at least. > > _______________________________________________ > AVR-libc-dev mailing list > AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
