As David Goodenough wrote: > Unfortunately savannah will not let me register, keeps complaining that > I should contact its administrator.
Then please do (open a "support" ticket). > Is there any way to complain to Atmel and suggest that a little > consistancy would be helpful. <a...@atmel.com>, though I doubt they'll do that kind of changes for existing products. > As an alternative, as so as not to break existing code, would it not > be possible to define both, i.e. if OVF is defined then define OVERFLOW > to match, and vica verca. That's beyond the goal of avr-libc: avr-libc wants to provide what the datasheet tells you. As such, we don't blindly follow datasheet changes. For instance, if a later datasheet revision changes a name that was prviously named differently, but the original doesn't conflict with anything else, we usually keep both names. However, establishing a kind of compatibility layer is beyond the scope of the project. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
