As Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: > The attached patch to wdt.h gets rid of the huge device specific > conditional branches for wdt_enable and wdt_disable.
That's cool. The current state of affairs used to be a continued cause for being forgotten upon adding a new devices. > I do see bigger code at -O0 though. Is that an acceptable tradeoff? For wdt_enable/wdt_disable, yes, it is. Only wdt_reset() must be kept as short as possible, but as this translates directly into one assembly instruction, that's not an issue. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
