> > Hi Galen, Scott, > > > > Thanks for the feedback. Would an algorithm such as this be > acceptable?: > > > > 1. If -U switches exist on command line, then follow those > sequences exactly > > 2. else (no -U switches exist on command line) follow > automatic sequence: > > 2.1. Fuses (verify, if different: write and verify) > > 2.2. Flash (erase, write, verify) > > 2.3. EEPROM (verify, if different: erase, write, and verify) > > > > Eric > > Will multiple -U options be honored?
That was the intent, yes. I sort of implied it by saying "-U switches" (plural) above. But to be explicit, yes, multiple -U options would be honored just as they are now, no change in that functionality. > So could I tell it to write the flash and fuses, but not the EEPROM? Yes. The main point was that if *no* -U options were on the command line AND an ELF file is used as the input file, then it would default to the "automatic sequence" described above. > If so then it will work for what I need. > > Thanks! > Great! :-) Eric _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
