only problem with this theory is that i must have programmed it before shipping since its a preburned chip, and it would have conked out then since i check the sig's before programming. maybe it changed its mind since then?
On Nov 5, 2007 4:02 PM, Jason Pepas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/2/07, Jason Pepas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tried it about 4 times over the course of half an hour last night. > > I'll run it again a few times just to double check. > > > > My programmer is a little bit hackish (I bought the spoke pov parallel > > port interface before I realized there was a 10 pin and 6 pin ICSP > > standard for the avr's, so I used some hookup wire to translate from > > one to the other. it took me a couple of times to get it working), > > but it would seem odd that the same bit is off each time. > > I tried it again, this time to the boarduino as well as to an atmel > "butterfly" demo board. The boarduino consistently shows up as > 0x1e9407, whereas the butterfly (correctly) shows up as 0x1e9406. > However, the boarduino works correctly when I tell avrdude to ignore > the device signature discrepancy. > > was my avr manufactured with a single incorrect bit? perhaps i have a > collector's item on my hands... > > -jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > avrdude-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev > _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
