Follow-up Comment #4, bug #22699 (project avrdude):
Followup to Joerg's comment on #2:
>> 2. The following devices use device code 0x75 although that
>> is already allocated to the mega16 bootloader. I suggest
>> that device code 0x73 might be better: mega329, mega329p,
>> mega3290, mega3290p, mega649, mega6490.
>
> I agree that 0x75 is a poor choice, and should be avoided.
> But in which respect would 0x73 (ATmega32 BOOT) be better
> here?
This is a typo on my part - I couldn't read my own writing. It should have
said 0x78 (mega169).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?22699>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
_______________________________________________
avrdude-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
