As giuliano carlini wrote: > Thanks. Perhaps it's time to move to a new bootloader.
Well, I think for just a bootloader, STK500v1 is OK. > Can you recommend a simple, light, bootloader that avrdude supports? The only more lightweight protocol would be AVR109 (the "butterfly" one). Not sure about how far you could get STK500v2 down though. It's a bit larger in the comm handling as it includes a real CRC, but maybe if you restrict it to the things that are required for a bootloader, it's fine. Peter Fleury has one: http://jump.to/fleury ``Fits into a 512work boot loader section.'' Question to the list: the "cycle counter" feature is currently always implied, probing the last EEPROM cells for the counter. Should we perhaps make this an explicit feature? I think it doesn't make real sense to even probe it unless the -y (or -Y) option is enabled. (I think Brian enabled the probing by default so it can write that "count is ... (if being tracked)" message.) -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
