Yes, looks like you are correct. I'm not sure the different of the two functions, but being that they are identical, I would say it's missing it there as well.
Thanks. Sincerely, Jason Joerg Wunsch wrote: > > (Better subscribe to the list, in order to not miss followups.) > > As Jason Kotzin wrote: > >> 680 unsigned char *buffer = (m->buf)+address; >> 681 unsigned char blockflags = USBASP_BLOCKFLAG_FIRST; >> >> >> Above is the new code, line 680 used to be as follows: >> >> 680 unsigned char *buffer = m->buf; > > Thanks a lot for debugging this, as well as for the patch. Normally, > I'd ask you to file it in the patch tracker, but I'm just about to > apply it right now, so that's not necessary this time. > > One question though: wouldn't usbasp_spi_paged_load() require a > similar change? > -- > cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL > > http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) > > _______________________________________________ > avrdude-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/bug-in-usbasp.c-tp33071691p33075496.html Sent from the AVR - AVRdude - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
