MPSSE is limited to FT2232D, FT2232H, and FT4232H chips though, isn't it? With the patches in 9327 <https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?9327> and 9328 <https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?9328>, it's possible to program an ATtiny10 chip in about 2 seconds on Linux and about 5 seconds on Windows using pretty much any FTDI chip.
--david On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:09 AM Hannes Weisbach <hannes_weisb...@gmx.net> wrote: > I don’t believe I’ve ever published my TPI for FTDI MPSSE. So, if no-one > else has implemented this(I did not follow avrdude development closely), I > believe avrdude can't do MPSSE+TPI. > > -- > Best regards, > Hannes > > > Am 20.03.2019 um 08:31 schrieb Joerg Wunsch <j...@uriah.heep.sax.de>: > > > > As Wayne Holder wrote: > > > >> I'm trying to use AVRDUDE on macOS 0.14.2 to communicate with an > ATTiny10 > >> that's connected an FTDI breakout board like this: > > > > Curious: for an FTDI, why use serbb? It's among the slowest possible > > options. Don't you have the possibility to use FTDI's MPSSE? All it > > requires is one of the supported chips (see the FTDI website), and > > the presence of libftdi (which is opensource) on your system. > > > > Since all the bitbanging is then handled inside the FTDI chip, this > > is going to be way faster than serbb which has to complicatedly > > transfer full USB packets for each single bit change. > > -- > > cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL > > > > http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ > > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > avrdude-dev mailing list > > avrdude-dev@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > avrdude-dev mailing list > avrdude-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev > _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list avrdude-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev