[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762937#action_12762937
]
Sharad Agarwal commented on AVRO-80:
------------------------------------
I think there should be a default and easy way to work with Strings. I came
across couple of instances where potential users enquired about this and this
limitation deterred them to use Avro.
Should we make the reflect *default* representation of String schema as
java.lang.String itself? I agree that performance is the concern but I think
for reflect that trade-off is fine.
> 'reflect' implementation requires Avro classes to define types
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-80
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-80
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: java
> Reporter: Sharad Agarwal
>
> Since 'reflect' implementation is expected to work with existing code, it
> should work with java types. For example it should work with java String
> instead of org.apache.avro.util.Utf8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
