I was confused, cause when i opened i observed that there was too much stuff made with Tru (tm) 3D, the renderer, but and everybody here knows that, the really cool stuff was made in away3d, so the site is made with away3d, but also with Tru, anyway is a great job from both engines.
with Tru(tm) 3D, the renderer != with Tru(tm) as the renderer... "The only 3D rendering on this project is with Away3D. " the really cool stuff was made in away3d, so the site is made with away3d, I also hope this clears things up. On 6 jul, 23:14, mogg <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't get Tru 3D confused with a 3D render... it is not. > > Tru 3D is for using "3D glasses" like you do in the theater to provide > a false depth perception. They are using it in combination with > Away3D. > > The only 3D rendering on this project is with Away3D. > > I hope this clears things up. > > On Jul 6, 7:07 am, desgraci <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ok i wasnt to answer that, but hey, to make clear, the project is not > > made in away3d, but i not saying this post isnt valid, ofc it rocks > > that ppl uses away3d for projects like this, that uses a cool > > rendering engine, ...as Fabrice said, there are parts done with > > away3d, not the entire project, you may be refereing to a big part or > > at least very important parts of the project. I was confused, cause > > when i opened i observed that there was too much stuff made with Tru > > (tm) 3D, the renderer, but and everybody here knows that, the really > > cool stuff was made in away3d, so the site is made with away3d, but > > also with Tru, anyway is a great job from both engines. > > > So if u right click on the project it <b>WONT </b> show the away3d > > menu, only if u pick the 3d part, that obviusly is what we re > > interested most of, ok?
