did you call 911? :))

normally flash id cs4 should insert the adress of flexsdk into the fla
generally it complains once then second output it does it. But you need to have 
updated cs4, if you use the one
delivered out of the box, there are some issues with the embeds cleared after 
the update (hence the joke in the warning)
hit he update menu in CS4 in this case.

since its aw_0, the first one,
chances are also you have not the right path and flash simply cannot find the 
file at the adress relative to the .as file where the embeds are.

Prefab outputs a folder with class and a folder "images"

the folder around is made to prevent you overwrite by mistake something.
so prior to use you need to move the class and images folder into your project
and eventually adjust the package if you haven't in Prefab.

This would fail:

myProject
        fla
        swf
        somepackage
                PrefabOutput
                        PrefabOutput.as
                                images
                                        somejpg's

You just need to move the folder output content where you need it.
like this for instance.

myProject
        fla
        swf
        somepackage
                PrefabOutput.as
                        images
                                somejpg's

note that you must have set as package in Prefab in this case: "somepackage"

Fabrice


On Aug 6, 2010, at 1:46 AM, DonLawrence wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I brought an obj file into preFab and then exported to an Away3D AS3
> class from prefab.  The obj file is made up of sixty pieces labeled
> aw_0, aw_1, etc.  When I try to create an instance of that class in
> Flash I get no compiler errors, but in the output window I get a
> message like the following for each of the sixty pieces:
> 
> "Embed of aw_0 failed! Check source path or if CS4 call 911!"
> 
> I downloaded the FlexSDK, and I believe I have the right path to the
> FlexSDK included on the library path tab of my AS3 settings.
> 
> I am using Flash CS4 on a Mac.  Any ideas what could be going wrong?
> 
> Thank you.

Reply via email to