Hey Jerome Even though Away3D 3.6 has had a bit of an overhaul, i would still say that Away3D Lite is faster at most high-poly stuff - even though the gap has certainly shortened. I've not done any detailed benchmarks tho - this is purely a hunch based on what goes on in each engine under the hood ;)
Rob On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Jerome <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > I am about to start up on a few projects where performance is key. In > pre 3.6 days I would have gone with Lite. But now that Away3D is full > of FP10 goodness, I am not sure Lite is more performant. > > So, if the experts have recommendations, that would be great. The > compile size is not much of an issue. CPU and memory are key, tho. > > Thank you, > > Jerome. -- Rob Bateman Flash Development & Consultancy [email protected] www.infiniteturtles.co.uk www.away3d.com
