On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Julien Danjou<[email protected]> wrote: > At 1252064589 time_t, Cedric GESTES wrote: >> A better solution is to check for nil in geometry? > > Yes. > > -- > Julien Danjou > // ᐰ <[email protected]> http://julien.danjou.info > // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD > // Anna Molly! Anna Molly! Anna Molly! > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkqg/mkACgkQpGK1HsL+5c05agCg4JrgqMGcVM0/3gkf/FKwVYc0 > qrUAoNdDy/H875fxvqvAEuQx+1McjhKs > =1mtI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
From 3c16e6391ffbe6d2df7138fbbddfc61eb46b0a03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cedric GESTES <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:55:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] client: check for nil geometry
Signed-off-by: Cedric GESTES <[email protected]> --- client.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/client.c b/client.c index 9950958..1000e2b 100644 --- a/client.c +++ b/client.c @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ luaA_client_geometry(lua_State *L) { client_t *c = luaA_client_checkudata(L, 1); - if(lua_gettop(L) == 2) + if(lua_gettop(L) == 2 && !lua_isnil(L, 2)) { area_t geometry; -- 1.6.0.4
