On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM, awesome <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Any improvements about this? Was the patch accepted? > > Nope, the patch is not accepted for the reason described in comment: http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=664#comment1569. I agree with Julien but I can't think of a cleaner way without touching other parts at the moment, however feel free to give ideas :) On a somewhat unrelated note: I think it's a good way to make all functions that are connected as a signal handler to be non-anonymous to make it easier to unregister them if someone wants to. I'll goto bed now :D
