I think the ticks look _very_ nice -- especially with the gradients. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Adrian C. <an...@sysphere.org> wrote: > Hello, > sticking to the same principles from my last e-mail, the "simple is > better than complex" and so on, here is the second version of ticks. > > My biggest dilemma in the last e-mail was ticks and gaps sizes. > Considering possible implementations I settled on the following; being > that the awful.widget.progressbar has a default size (100px wide) why > not have a default tick and gap size (4px and 1px respectively). If a > user goes trough the trouble of changing progressbar properties, and > also enables ticks, why wouldn't he choose his own tick size, one that > is more appropriate to his chosen progressbar dimensions. > > > Three methods are available: set_ticks (false by default), > set_ticks_size (width or height if horizontal or vertical) and > set_ticks_gap. The gaps are drawn only over the gradient, the same color > as the progressbar background. > > But (unlike the previous version) the number of ticks for the whole > progressbar is calculated, so the gaps could be drawn in advance (by > removing rel_offset comparison to rel_height/rel_x). But in that case > the gaps should be of a different color (like wibox background), to get > the effect of empty ticks. > > > Demonstration of progressbars, with usage examples: > - http://bljak.org/~anrxc/images/progressbars.png > > > -- > Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618 > PGP FP: 02A5 628A D8EE 2A93 996E 929F D5CB 31B7 D20A 0618 >
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
