Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> writes:

> It's easier to do when nothing uses the screens yet. Also, this would 
> complicate
>  the rc.lua a bit, since screen.count() could now change over time...

Yes but…

> On the other hand, that's a great idea if we ever want to handle xrandr screen
> changes without restarting...

…this is what I was I going to write.

> I might look into this (if I find the time).

You may consider taking a look at 'next' which has a better and richer
screen support towards xrandr.

(Maybe we should do something about 'next' some day…)

-- 
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <[email protected]>   http://julien.danjou.info

Attachment: pgp8XZJseVSZC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to