On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I get to choose, I'd prefer getters since they are the more generic > solution. You can implement increment/decrement with them, but you can't > implement a getter via increment/decrement. (yay, I like NACK'ing ;-) > > Uli > That seems reasonable to me. So if there's a formal patch for a getter would you push it? I could make one, but not for several hours. -- > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? > Duly noted.
