On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I get to choose, I'd prefer getters since they are the more generic
> solution. You can implement increment/decrement with them, but you can't
> implement a getter via increment/decrement. (yay, I like NACK'ing ;-)
>
> Uli
>

That seems reasonable to me. So if there's a formal patch for a getter would
you push it? I could make one, but not for several hours.

-- 
> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
>

Duly noted.

Reply via email to