On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:27:13AM +0200, Arvydas Sidorenko wrote: > Keeping Lua 5.1 compatibility is absolutely crucial since making > Awesome v5.2-only would be pointless and harmful. Every single push
I'm extremely pleased to hear you say that -- you'd be amazed at how many people don't consider this kind of compatibility when doing this kind of thing. > was tested to make sure nothing got broken. I am running Awesome from > my git and lua 5.1 since the beginning and not seeing anything wrong. > The lua code is different though - the WM is a little broken. But it > was expected and I'll fix it. There are a few tricks to making Lua code work well for both 5.1 and 5.2 -- not least is eliminating the use of 'module()' :-) D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/ PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69 -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
