On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 02:38:24AM +0400, Сергей Миронов wrote: > 2009/4/12 koniu <[email protected]>: > > 2009/4/12 Сергей Миронов <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, i`m writing config to implement some of shifty's functionality (by > >> the way, Is shifty dead or alive nowdays?) > > > > It's more and more alive again, I've updated the wiki today, see that > > for details. Testing much appreciated ;] > > > >> every tag's layout resets to 'floating'. Is it a bug? > > > > screen:tags(arg) does wipe all tag properties: > > http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=493 > > > > jd has a branch (new-object) which removes use of otable and is > > supposed to alleviate this issue. It should soon find its way to > > master branch. > > > > hope this helps, > > koniu > > > > Hi! i tried to check the case again. Now i use awesome 3.2.1-r3 and > following wmii wiki guide > http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/WMII-like_tag_management > > In function > > function sort_tags(screen_no) > local all_tags = screen[screen_no]:tags() > table.sort(all_tags, function (a, b) return a.name < b.name end) > screen[screen_no]:tags(all_tags) > end > > i see same behavior as earlier - screen:tags() resets all tag's properties. > It is strange for me, because i know, that bug #493 was closed at 12 april. > How can it be, am i missing something?
Hi there buddy. The new object system went in the tree post 3.2.1. Could you please try with one of the 3.3.x tags? Cheers. \n\n -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
