Hi Keith,
that is a known regression.
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6580469
The reverting of the fix (Mark provided you the patch) solves the problem.
Thank you,
Denis.
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Keith,
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 14:54 -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
The problem is in updateCurrentCursor, which ignores the target action,
and simply hard codes it to DnDConstants.ACTION_NONE:
[...]
As a result of this override of targetAct, "ra" will _always_ evaluate
to false, and the code will never return a droppable cursor.
Does this override serve a purpose that I am unable to guess?
I didn't see a review on list, but the following patch seems to
essentially do what you suggest:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2008-May/000253.html
Cheers,
Mark
