Hi Oleg, > >> I'd synchronized setting/getting of access field. And (perhaps) I'd only > >> allow > >> set this field once. > > > > Good ideas. I implemented both suggestions. Webrev is updated at the > > same URL. > > As far as I can see you add synchronization only to setter, but you > should also add > synchronization when you read this field. So you should either make > access field > volatile, or add synchronized getter and use it to get the field.
Duh, you are right. I should better think twice before I send new patch :-). Now it should be correct, what do you think? Webrev still here: http://kennke.org/~roman/componentaccess/webrev/ /Roman -- http://kennke.org/blog/
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
