Hi, Anthony.
looks good.
20.03.2012 16:07, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for the review. Indeed, a test case should be fine for this
fix, so here's the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anthony/7u4-5-invisibleOwner-7154177.1/
As to the 2), I prefer to not add tests for things that should be
improved eventually, so instead I've filed a CR 7155164 to address
this issue later.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 3/19/2012 4:23 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi Anthony.
probably it would be good to add 2 regression tests for this issue?
1) For the current issue, which wasn't found by the existing tests.
2) For the issue which was not resolved in the current fix.
16.03.2012 19:22, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hello,
Please review a fix for
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7154177 at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anthony/7u4-5-invisibleOwner-7154177.0/
Basically, with this fix we make sure we never make an invisible
window an owner or a child for another window on the native level.
This way the OS won't accidentally show an invisible window on the
screen.
Note that there's one scenario that isn't handled properly with this
fix:
// visible root owner
// invisible owner
// visible dialog
In this case the visible dialog will not be tied with the visible
root owner by the child-parent relationship. However, this scenario
seems to be very unlikely to occur in real life.
--
best regards,
Anthony
--
Best regards, Sergey.
