Hi Anthony, On 08/07/2012 09:18 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote: > I've also read the discussion that took place on build-dev@ regarding > this issue, and it seems to me that adding an RPATH entry to launchers > is the right solution for this issue. We may want to also add a comment > there and state that this entry is added specifically to address the > jawt use case. Perhaps it makes sense to also add a comment somewhere in > a jawt makefile to state that we rely on this RPATH entry in the > launcher. This way we can ensure that even if the jawt library is moved > around, the relevant RPATH entry gets updated accordingly as well.
Thanks for you suggestions! I am going to post a patch based on your suggestions to build-dev. Thanks, Omair
