I don't believe getNativeContainer() should ever traverse a hierarchy outside of the toplevel window for component of which it's been called (or for the window itself if it's called on a Window instance). If some code expects otherwise, then there is a bug in that code which needs fixing.

Could you please point me to exact locations where the code does that?

--
best regards,
Anthony

On 04/22/2013 06:24 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 22.04.2013 17:55, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Ah, I see the Component.getNativeContainer() checks whether the peer
is lightweight or not. I believe it needs to be overridden in the
Window class to return "this", though. Otherwise there's still a bug
in this method.
But window's implementation mix owner/container during initialization of
WWindowPeer. There is only one field "parent", which assigned from the
SunToolkit.getNativeContainer().
I assume that, when this method was added the window's parent/container
and the window's owner were one concept.
I don't quite understand this point. Please elaborate.

What I see is that we call SunToolkit.getNativeContainer() which isn't
overridden in UNIXToolkit nor XToolkit, and thus results in a call to
Toolkit.getNativeContainer(). The latter calls
Component.getNativeContainer(). Which, w/o an override suggested
above, produces an incorrect result and is the root cause of our bug,
isn't it?
The question is, what the result is correct. Currently, some code
expects the owner will be refunded.

--
best regards,
Anthony


--
best regards,
Anthony

On 04/22/13 16:06, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix for jdk 8.
SetEnable method check status of all parent containers and windows(via
getParent() in SunToolkit.getNativeContainer()). But only
containers in
the same window should be checked.
The new method was added to return the peer of the nearest heavyweight
container.

Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7166296
Webrev can be found at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7166296/webrev.00





Reply via email to