On 23.09.2013 17:45, Anthony Petrov wrote:
That indeed seems logical. Moreover, the HeadlessException doesn't
have a specification yet (see 8016313). However, I think that AWT
doesn't consider itself headless even if the devices array is empty.
Headless is a special mode, after all. I'd go with returning null for
now - other code will catch NPEs, but that's OK. Later we may decide
whether consider this case headless or not.
I think that we should not return null here, but instead we should
somehow handle situations then list of screens is updated to the empty
array not then it used.
--
best regards,
Anthony
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 09/23/13 16:47, sergey malenkov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
fix:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/7117595.8.0/
bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7117595
Thanks,
SAM
--
Best regards, Sergey.
