Hi Pete,

Please look into the latest version:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8145984/jdk8u/webrev.2/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8145984/jdk8u/webrev.2/>

and the discussion with Sergey.

> On 04 Jan 2016, at 21:16, Pete Brunet <peter.bru...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Anton, Why did you change CAccessible.dispose() from protected to public?  
> Shouldn't it be left protected?  -Pete

I did that due to introducing an interface with dispose() method. But with the 
latest fix, there’s no that change anymore.

Regards,
Anton.

> 
> On 12/22/15 3:45 PM, Anton Tarasov wrote:
>> Hi Pete,
>> 
>> Thanks for the review!
>> 
>>> On 22 Dec 2015, at 23:07, Pete Brunet < 
>>> <mailto:peter.bru...@oracle.com>peter.bru...@oracle.com 
>>> <mailto:peter.bru...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Anton, Some comments/questions:
>>> - Some copyright dates need updating
>> 
>> Indeed, I’ll update them.
>> 
>>> - Line 1112 of JavaComponentAccessibility: does the release of jaccessible 
>>> cause a release of jparent?
>> 
>> As I can see, jparent there is only a ref to jComponent, which in its turn 
>> is a JNIGlobalRef (or anyway is a class field). So, I don’t see the need to 
>> delete it… (or did I miss something?)
>> 
>>> - Line 7155 of Component.java: is that the only place where this means is 
>>> needed?
>> 
>> If you mean to call AC.dispose() than - yes, I think so. We rather don’t 
>> want to dispose the context until the Component goes out of the UI 
>> hierarchy, which is when Component.removeNotify() is _always_ getting called 
>> (for hw & lw components).
>> 
>> Anton.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Pete
>>> 
>>> On 12/22/15 8:10 AM, Anton Tarasov wrote:
>>>> Hi guys!
>>>> 
>>>> Could you please review the problem I’ve filed and the suggested fix?
>>>> 
>>>> bug: JDK-8145984 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145984> 
>>>> sun.lwawt.macosx.CAccessible leaks
>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8145984/jdk9/webrev.0 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eant/JDK-8145984/jdk9/webrev.0>
>>>> 
>>>> (This is to be addressed in 8u/9. The webrev for 8u is in JIRA, it’s 
>>>> identical except the paths.)
>>>> 
>>>> Please, find the details in JIRA.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Anton.
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to