Hi All,

The code was changed on the same lines in one file after the first review was 
generated. A new review is generated after taking an update of the code.
Fix wise the webrev.00 and webrev.01 are same.

Please review webrev.01
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8156460/webrev.01/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8156460/webrev.01/>

Also note that along with the previous 10 issues as mentioned in the first 
review mail below another two new issues created 2 days ago also gets resolved 
by this fix.
The 2 new issues are:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160144 
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160144>
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160145 
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160145>

Thank you Avik for your comment. The lines were moved up to maintain the order 
of modifier values in increasing order.

Thanks,
Manajit


> On 21-Jun-2016, at 12:10 pm, Avik Niyogi <avik.niy...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> The fix looks good to me. 
> A small query though, line 281 - 290 is required at that position, looks like 
> it was moved.
> 
> With Regards,
> Avik Niyogi
>> From: Manajit Halder 
>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 1:56 AM
>> To: Sergey Bylokhov; Semyon Sadetsky
>> Cc: awt-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:awt-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>> Subject: <AWT Dev> <AWT dev>[9] Review request for JDK-8156460 [macosx] Test 
>> case javax/swing/JPopupMenu/6827786/bug6827786.java fails
>>  
>> Hi All,
>>  
>> Please review the regression fix for issue JDK-8156460 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156460> which fixes below 
>> mentioned test cases.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8156460/webrev.00/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhalder/8156460/webrev.00/>
>>  
>> This fix resolves the following 3 JCK failures and 7 test failures:
>>  
>> JCK tests:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158621 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158621>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158485 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158485>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158501 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158501>
>>  
>> Jtreg tests:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158389 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158389>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158526 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158526>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158496 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158496>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158362 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158362>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158512 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158512>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156460 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156460>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158377 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158377>
>>  
>> Reason of failure:
>>             The modifier value calculation was wrong.
>>  
>> Note that with this fix the test 
>> /java/awt/keyboard/AllKeyCode/AllKeyCode.java will fail due to the reason 
>> that pressing number (0 to 9) after pressing arrow keys( up, down, left and 
>> right) will generate corresponding Numpad keys code for number keys (0 to 
>> 9). Whereas if the arrow key are pressed after number keys are pressed then 
>> there is no problem. An issue will be created for this issue once this fix 
>> is accepted.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Manajit
> 

Reply via email to