>> Its is unimportant because most of them are not in the public API, some of >> them are aligned intentionally, but if you will find something useful feel >> free to file it file it and fix. > I see a lot of such formatting issues (hundreds) in public APIs. Are you > proposing to create bugs per each of them? > Why not fix them in this bug? This is very easy and harmless.
Why hundreds? In the previous email you mention 2500 issues, so feel free to file them and fix. I fixed an issues which I found when I reread the specification of the methods and tried to find a typos in it. >> >>> From the descripton of the bug you pretend: >>> >>> "Uncommon formatting and typos in java.desktop module" >>> >>> Then why only javax.sound is considered? A bug tittle issue? >> Did you read the text which were in the first email, which describe what >> things were fixed? > Yes, I did. But it doesn't correspond to JIRA's title and description. I updated description of the bug. >> >>> But this contradicts to the webrev you've sent because it contains > > src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/text/html/AccessibleHTML.java > > 1655 * @gsee #getAccessibleChild > > I suggest to grep code for javadoc keywords (@...) typos. This is not a public API.
