I have updated the regression test for the fix. The new version is located at 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8155197/webrev.01/
Now the test is failed on the build without fix and passed on the build with 
the fix. Tested on Mac and Windows.

Many thanks to Alexey for his help with testing and valuable advice regarding 
test modifications.

Semyon,
I performed the test, you requested, (i.e. replaced the code in LWComponentPeer 
and ran the regression test on jdk10 build w/o the fix). Both versions of the 
regression test were failed. It looks like that result is quite expected, isn’t 
it?

Thanks,
Dmitry
> On 28 Sep 2017, at 04:02, Semyon Sadetsky <semyon.sadet...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alexey & Dmitry,
> 
> The bug may be a Mac specific issue.
> Can you try to replace in the LWComponentPeer::requestFocus
> 
> 960                boolean res = parentPeer.requestWindowFocus(cause);
> with
>                 KeyboardFocusManagerPeer kfmPeer = 
> LWKeyboardFocusManagerPeer.getInstance();
>                 Component focusOwner = kfmPeer.getCurrentFocusedWindow();
>                 boolean res = parentPeer.getTarget() == focusOwner || 
> parentPeer.requestWindowFocus(cause); 
> 
> and run the test without the current fix on jdk10?
> 
> --Semyon  
> 
> On 9/27/2017 1:45 PM, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Hi Semyon,
>> 
>> You're right: the test does not fail for me too on Windows 10 using jdk10. 
>> At the same time, I can reproduce the problem using focus8Test.jar attached 
>> to the bug [1]. However, it's harder to reproduce the issue using jdk10 or 
>> jdk9. It takes more attempts than with jdk8.
>> 
>> 
>> I could reproduce the problem on Windows 7 and Windows 10.
>> 
>> However, if I switch the theme to Windows Basic or Windows Classic in 
>> Windows 7, the issue cannot be reproduced any more. It looks as if it's 
>> related to window animation when a new dialog appears and disappears. If the 
>> dialog appears on the screen for a longer while, the test does not fail 
>> either.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Alexey
>> 
>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155197 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155197>
>> 
>> On 26/09/2017 23:46, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>> 
>>> On 9/26/2017 1:56 AM, Dmitry Markov wrote:
>>>> Hi Semyon,
>>>> 
>>>> Please find my answer inline.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dmitry
>>>>> On 25 Sep 2017, at 22:26, Semyon Sadetsky <semyon.sadet...@oracle.com> 
>>>>> <mailto:semyon.sadet...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 09/25/2017 01:09 PM, Dmitry Markov wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Semyon,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This issue and the problem addressed by 8139218 and 8159432 are slightly 
>>>>>> different. This one is still reproducible on latest 9 and 10 builds 
>>>>>> using the test case attached to the bug or regression test provided with 
>>>>>> the fix.
>>>>> I couldn't get the test failed on 9 and 10. But I only tried it on 
>>>>> Ubuntu. Is the issue a platform dependent?
>>>> I was able to reproduce the issue on Windows and Mac OSX. I didn’t test 
>>>> Linux, but I guess it is present there too.
>>>> Note: if you use VirtualBoxVM, it is necessary to enable 3D acceleration 
>>>> to reproduce the issue.
>>> Not sure that 3D may change focus behavior. But I did not uses physical 
>>> Ubuntu to test.
>>> I also couldn't get the test failed on Windows platform after 10 attempts:
>>> 
>>> ssadetsk@SSADETSK-LAP1 /data/projects/client10/jdk
>>> $ for ((n=0;n<10;n++)); do `/data/jtreg/bin/jtreg 
>>> -jdk:../build/windows-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/jdk -nr 
>>> test/java/awt/Focus/FocusTransitionTest/FocusTransitionTest.java`; done
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> Test: extra argument ‘passed:’
>>> 
>>>>>> The problem takes place when we restore focus to a component and its 
>>>>>> parent window owns the focus. In this case we invoke doRestoreFocus(), 
>>>>>> (i.e. restore focus synchronously). If the parent window loses the focus 
>>>>>> during this invocation, focus request will fail and focus target will be 
>>>>>> shifted to next in focus traversal cycle. This case is not covered by 
>>>>>> the changes introduced by 8139218 and 8159432.
>>>>> I see. What may prevent to set the input focus synchronously? Since the 
>>>>> native window already has the focus this should be very deterministic.
>>>> The native window loses focus if another window or dialog is displayed. 
>>>> Proposed fix is intended for the following case:
>>>> The native window owns focus and we set the focus to one of its child 
>>>> components synchronously, (i.e. invoke doRestoreFocus() -> 
>>>> requestFocus()). At the same time another window/dialog pops up, 
>>>> requestFocus() fails because the native parent window is not the focus 
>>>> owner any more and we shift focus target to next component.
>>> The requestFocus() calls the requestFocusHelper() which has several 
>>> outcomes that returns "false". Which one of them should be involved?
>>> 
>>> --Semyon
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to