This works on my system.
+1
-phil.
On 05/10/2018 01:30 PM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the quick review.
<<Execing xrandr twice ? Can't we either just re-write the code to not
use takeWhile() which
<<is part of the problem, or less desirably store the results into an
internal buffer
<<and read it from there using StringReader/StringWriter - wrapped in
BufferedReader/BufferedWriter ?
Yes that makes much more sense. I have removed takeWhile as I think
filter should do the work here. There will not be need to ignore any line.
I have also used the try-with-resource as suggested.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pbansal/8196616/webrev.01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epbansal/8196616/webrev.01/>
Regards,
Pankaj Bansal
*From:*Phil Race
*Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2018 12:59 AM
*To:* Pankaj Bansal; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [11] Review Request: JDK-8196616
java/awt/GraphicsDevice/DisplayModes/CompareToXrandrTest.java fails
Execing xrandr twice ? Can't we either just re-write the code to not
use takeWhile() which
is part of the problem, or less desirably store the results into an
internal buffer
and read it from there using StringReader/StringWriter - wrapped in
BufferedReader/BufferedWriter ?
Also I think you should use try-with-resources on the reading from the
"real" stream.
And a style point :
while((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
->
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
-phil.
On 05/10/2018 12:21 PM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
Hi All, Please review test fix for the below bug:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196616
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pbansal/8196616/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epbansal/8196616/webrev.00/>
The test case create a BufferedReader and this BufferedReader is
used to find XRanderModes and JavaModes and compare them.
It is assumed in this test that the first two lines of the
BufferedReader don’t have the useful mode data and contain some
other information. So it ignores first two lines. But this is not
always true and test may have to ignore more or less lines
depending upon the data.
Made changes to the test to check how many lines should be
ignored, instead of hard coding the number of lines to ignore.
Regards,
Pankaj Bansal