Changing it to "strings" sounds fine.
Pre-approved.
-phil.
On 10/30/18, 6:41 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
This one looks odd :
+ * Each element of the array should be a set of three {@code Strings}
Since there is no class called "Strings".
Is that how plurals are handled in other parts of the javadoc ?
I thought I might have used {@code String}s instead but I don't know
how that formats.
This is a questionable place, the {@code Strings} is not strictly
correct,
but {@code String}s is looks odd as well, because part of the same
word is rendered by the
different fonts in the javadoc.
Probably the best choice is to change the "Strings" to the
plain "strings"(lowcase S)?
